Of the practice of copying and pasting. Even citing the sources and linking them. And unless you have the necessary authorization or the page consulted explicitly states otherwise. The law considers it an infraction. In short. It is one thing to make puzzles. Even if the pieces fit together. With bits of information. And quite another to create new content after being informed. Writing on the internet. Closed to intrusiveness? I read almost daily articles related to writing on the internet and also some of the comments they provoke among readers. I had wanted to write my own reflections on the subject for a long time and. It has been an article by kyle wiens published in the harvard business review that has acted as a fuse.
The choice of the word does not contain any incendiary intention. Kyle wiens’ (drastic?) stance angry boss in short. What the author says is that he would never hire a person who does not know how to write correctly . Even if their functions within the company are not related to writing texts for later publication. Wiens bases his argument on the idea that a person who is careless when writing will also be careless in the exercise of his work . Whatever it may be. Because it denotes a lack of interest in learning (he keeps repeating the same mistakes he made).
When He Learned
To write at school) and does not value the importance El Salvador email list of details (which can be extrapolated to any activity he carries out at work). Without a doubt. His position is drastic and controversial. As evidenced by thehundreds of comments for and against that your article has provoked . But beyond its rigid and debatable attitude. The underlying theme confronts us with questions that are worth reflecting on ; issues that are continually raised in forums more or less specialized in communication and digital marketing. Fall euros state of affairs it does not occur to anyone in their right mind to try to practice medicine without being a doctor .
To build a building without having studied architecture. Or to apply for a position as a chemist without being one; however. On the internet who wants to write . Whether or not they are a professional writer. And whether we are talking about “personal” blogs or company websites. Anyone who regularly visits websites and blogs will know that “attacks” on grammar are a constant . It is no secret that some companies believe that the same person who exercises any other function within the company can take charge of the communication : if the texts are not very well written. “it is not so serious”.
At The Same Time
In our country. There are currently some 10.000 journalists who are unemployed . And if one takes a look at the job offers for copywriters. He will see that the market in this sector is busted: the remunerations offered are. For the most part. Simply embarrassing . Writing on the internet: a closed preserve for intrusiveness? Hand stop the question is a deliberate provocation because i think it misstates the issue . The history of literature is full of writers who never went through the then non-existent writing workshops. In the same way that (good) journalism has numerous professionals who were trained in other disciplines.
Taking endless writing courses does not guarantee that one learns to be a good writer. In the same way that journalists who write frankly badly come out of the faculties of journalism (information sciences); it is enough to read the daily press to come across this reality. Perhaps the point is that writing well depends on more than having received a certain academic training . So what does writing correctly depend on? Writing on the internet. An off limits to intrusiveness?_lladó communication in my opinion (leaving aside the obvious fact that training helps).